<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 282 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowed personal and administration expenses. Legitimate business expenditures should not be disallowed based on assumptions, and any recovery of expenditure from clients should be offered for tax. The judgment did not elaborate on the disallowed set off of unabsorbed depreciation and business loss, and ground number 3 was dismissed as not pressed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 282 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowed personal and administration expenses. Legitimate business expenditures should not be disallowed based on assumptions, and any recovery of expenditure from clients should be offered for tax. The judgment did not elaborate on the disallowed set off of unabsorbed depreciation and business loss, and ground number 3 was dismissed as not pressed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>