https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235979 The Court upheld the Enforcement Committee's jurisdiction to demand compensation and levy penalties under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Findings of forgery and fraudulent activities by the Petitioner were deemed legitimate based on evidence. The penalties and compensation demanded by the Committee were upheld as valid, with the Court emphasizing the Committee's authority to ensure restitution for wrongful acts. The recommendations made by the Committee to the Director-General of Foreign Trade were considered as non-binding suggestions. The petition was dismissed, affirming the Committee's actions and penalties imposed as lawful and justified. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:18:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235979 The Court upheld the Enforcement Committee's jurisdiction to demand compensation and levy penalties under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Findings of forgery and fraudulent activities by the Petitioner were deemed legitimate based on evidence. The penalties and compensation demanded by the Committee were upheld as valid, with the Court emphasizing the Committee's authority to ensure restitution for wrongful acts. The recommendations made by the Committee to the Director-General of Foreign Trade were considered as non-binding suggestions. The petition was dismissed, affirming the Committee's actions and penalties imposed as lawful and justified. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235979