<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 267 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235972</link>
    <description>A stay application may justify waiver of further pre-deposit where the demand is supported only by uncorroborated material and the appellants have already made a sufficient deposit. The commentary notes that alleged clandestine removal was based mainly on a Sales Manager Report without supporting evidence, while the SSI exemption and clubbing issues were said to be covered by binding judicial decisions and the impugned order appeared to travel beyond the show cause notices on some factual aspects. On that prima facie assessment, further deposit was waived, recovery was stayed during the appeal, and interim protection against coercive recovery was granted pending final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 267 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235972</link>
      <description>A stay application may justify waiver of further pre-deposit where the demand is supported only by uncorroborated material and the appellants have already made a sufficient deposit. The commentary notes that alleged clandestine removal was based mainly on a Sales Manager Report without supporting evidence, while the SSI exemption and clubbing issues were said to be covered by binding judicial decisions and the impugned order appeared to travel beyond the show cause notices on some factual aspects. On that prima facie assessment, further deposit was waived, recovery was stayed during the appeal, and interim protection against coercive recovery was granted pending final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>