<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 264 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the penalty imposed on the appellant for the shortage of finished goods during physical verification, considering it a case of clandestine removal warranting a penalty equal to the duty amount under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 264 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the penalty imposed on the appellant for the shortage of finished goods during physical verification, considering it a case of clandestine removal warranting a penalty equal to the duty amount under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>