<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 236 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the imposed penalties due to the excess quantity of Aluminium Scrap found during import compared to the declared quantity. While acknowledging the appellant&#039;s bonafide belief, leniency was shown in modifying the redemption fine to Rs.2,00,000/- and the penalty to Rs.75,000/- to achieve justice. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 236 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the imposed penalties due to the excess quantity of Aluminium Scrap found during import compared to the declared quantity. While acknowledging the appellant&#039;s bonafide belief, leniency was shown in modifying the redemption fine to Rs.2,00,000/- and the penalty to Rs.75,000/- to achieve justice. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>