<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 222 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of powers under Section 263 but modified the order, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessee&#039;s claim without being bound by the directive to treat the firm as an Association of Persons and disallow the remuneration claim. The appeal was partly allowed, instructing the AO to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 222 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of powers under Section 263 but modified the order, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessee&#039;s claim without being bound by the directive to treat the firm as an Association of Persons and disallow the remuneration claim. The appeal was partly allowed, instructing the AO to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>