https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235925 The High Court partially allowed the petitioner's challenge against the U.P. Commercial Tax Tribunal's order, modifying the stay to cover 95% of the disputed tax until the first appeal's disposal. The petitioner must deposit the remaining 5% within six weeks and provide security. The first appellate authority was directed to expedite the decision within two months. The Court emphasized the need for judicious exercise of stay power, considering financial constraints and case merit, as supported by legal precedents. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235925 The High Court partially allowed the petitioner's challenge against the U.P. Commercial Tax Tribunal's order, modifying the stay to cover 95% of the disputed tax until the first appeal's disposal. The petitioner must deposit the remaining 5% within six weeks and provide security. The first appellate authority was directed to expedite the decision within two months. The Court emphasized the need for judicious exercise of stay power, considering financial constraints and case merit, as supported by legal precedents. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235925