https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235916 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant for misdeclaration of goods for export. Despite the goods being classified as prohibited, both the customs authorities and the appellant genuinely believed otherwise. With no evidence of deliberate intent to export prohibited goods, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the goods to be taken back without delay. The stay application and appeal were granted. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235916 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant for misdeclaration of goods for export. Despite the goods being classified as prohibited, both the customs authorities and the appellant genuinely believed otherwise. With no evidence of deliberate intent to export prohibited goods, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the goods to be taken back without delay. The stay application and appeal were granted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235916