<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 209 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that the learned Commissioner was empowered to adjudicate the Advance Bill of Entry as requested by the appellant. The decision clarified the legal framework governing Advance Bill of Entry procedures and emphasized the importance of proper adjudication in addressing import-related violations or non-compliance issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 209 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that the learned Commissioner was empowered to adjudicate the Advance Bill of Entry as requested by the appellant. The decision clarified the legal framework governing Advance Bill of Entry procedures and emphasized the importance of proper adjudication in addressing import-related violations or non-compliance issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>