<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as barred by limitation due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide a consistent and sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that equitable considerations do not override the statutory requirements for filing appeals within the prescribed period, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 19:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as barred by limitation due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide a consistent and sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that equitable considerations do not override the statutory requirements for filing appeals within the prescribed period, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>