<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 170 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235875</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of service tax, penalties, and interest on multiple appellants for activities falling under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The appellants&#039; arguments regarding exemptions and time limitations were dismissed. The tribunal found that the appellants were liable to pay service tax on all charges, including reimbursable expenses, as per the Finance Act&#039;s definition of BAS. Additionally, the appellants were not entitled to the Commission Agent exemption under Notification 13/2003 due to the range of services provided beyond commission-based activities. Penalties were deemed applicable for non-payment of service tax and failure to file returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 170 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235875</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of service tax, penalties, and interest on multiple appellants for activities falling under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The appellants&#039; arguments regarding exemptions and time limitations were dismissed. The tribunal found that the appellants were liable to pay service tax on all charges, including reimbursable expenses, as per the Finance Act&#039;s definition of BAS. Additionally, the appellants were not entitled to the Commission Agent exemption under Notification 13/2003 due to the range of services provided beyond commission-based activities. Penalties were deemed applicable for non-payment of service tax and failure to file returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>