<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a violation of Section 111(m) of the Customs Act due to the incorrect declaration of value in the Bill of Entry. Despite acknowledging the error, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs and the penalty from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 12,000. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by further reducing the redemption fine and penalty amounts, reflecting a balanced approach in addressing the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a violation of Section 111(m) of the Customs Act due to the incorrect declaration of value in the Bill of Entry. Despite acknowledging the error, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs and the penalty from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 12,000. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellant by further reducing the redemption fine and penalty amounts, reflecting a balanced approach in addressing the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>