<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 150 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235855</link>
    <description>Non-production of Form C/D may justify denial of the concessional rate on inter-State sales, but the higher tax paid for that reason cannot be excluded from the tax benefit available under the eligibility certificate where the relevant monetary and other conditions are met. The Court followed its earlier ruling that the dealer may lose the reduced rate, yet remains entitled to set-off of the additional tax paid solely because the concessional documents were not produced. The assessment order was therefore required to be modified to allow that set-off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 150 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235855</link>
      <description>Non-production of Form C/D may justify denial of the concessional rate on inter-State sales, but the higher tax paid for that reason cannot be excluded from the tax benefit available under the eligibility certificate where the relevant monetary and other conditions are met. The Court followed its earlier ruling that the dealer may lose the reduced rate, yet remains entitled to set-off of the additional tax paid solely because the concessional documents were not produced. The assessment order was therefore required to be modified to allow that set-off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>