<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235842</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the amendment by the Finance Act, 2010, applies retrospectively. The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on unexplained cash deposits and the net profit rate for the liquor business, finding them reasonable and consistent with Tribunal precedents. All department appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235842</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the amendment by the Finance Act, 2010, applies retrospectively. The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on unexplained cash deposits and the net profit rate for the liquor business, finding them reasonable and consistent with Tribunal precedents. All department appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>