<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235837</link>
    <description>Second-hand photocopier machines imported after the operative restriction date were treated as restricted goods under the foreign trade policy framework, so import without a valid licence was impermissible. The declared transaction value was rejected because it was lower than contemporaneous import values and was not supported by reliable evidence; re-determination based on Chartered Engineer&#039;s report and NIDB data under the Customs Valuation Rules was upheld. On confiscation-related consequences, the redemption fine was maintained, while the penalty was reduced on proportionality considerations in light of the facts and past conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235837</link>
      <description>Second-hand photocopier machines imported after the operative restriction date were treated as restricted goods under the foreign trade policy framework, so import without a valid licence was impermissible. The declared transaction value was rejected because it was lower than contemporaneous import values and was not supported by reliable evidence; re-determination based on Chartered Engineer&#039;s report and NIDB data under the Customs Valuation Rules was upheld. On confiscation-related consequences, the redemption fine was maintained, while the penalty was reduced on proportionality considerations in light of the facts and past conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>