<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 128 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235833</link>
    <description>Marginal stock variations detected during annual stock verification, especially where some items also showed excess and the discrepancies could arise from weighing or dip-reading errors, do not by themselves establish actual shortage of inputs. In the absence of evidence of clandestine removal, such small and random discrepancies are insufficient to deny Cenvat credit or require reversal. On that basis, the demand for credit, interest, and penalty founded solely on the alleged stock shortage was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 128 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235833</link>
      <description>Marginal stock variations detected during annual stock verification, especially where some items also showed excess and the discrepancies could arise from weighing or dip-reading errors, do not by themselves establish actual shortage of inputs. In the absence of evidence of clandestine removal, such small and random discrepancies are insufficient to deny Cenvat credit or require reversal. On that basis, the demand for credit, interest, and penalty founded solely on the alleged stock shortage was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>