<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 124 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.2.50 lakhs within eight weeks to cover the demand within the limitation period. Upon compliance, the waiver of the remaining balance and stay on recovery were granted until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal acknowledged the complexity of determining the appellant&#039;s service categorization under the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the need for further examination during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 124 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs.2.50 lakhs within eight weeks to cover the demand within the limitation period. Upon compliance, the waiver of the remaining balance and stay on recovery were granted until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal acknowledged the complexity of determining the appellant&#039;s service categorization under the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the need for further examination during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>