<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 104 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235809</link>
    <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee was engaged in job work business and not in the purchase and sale of silver ornaments. The CIT(A) directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO, emphasizing the necessity of computation based on seized documents rather than unfounded presumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:57:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 104 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235809</link>
      <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that the assessee was engaged in job work business and not in the purchase and sale of silver ornaments. The CIT(A) directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO, emphasizing the necessity of computation based on seized documents rather than unfounded presumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>