<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 99 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235804</link>
    <description>The government upheld that the steamer agent is liable for short-landing or non-landing of goods under Section 116 of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the argument that mens rea is required for penalty imposition. Previous judgments cited were deemed inapplicable due to differing circumstances. The impugned order-in-appeal was upheld, and the revision application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 99 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235804</link>
      <description>The government upheld that the steamer agent is liable for short-landing or non-landing of goods under Section 116 of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the argument that mens rea is required for penalty imposition. Previous judgments cited were deemed inapplicable due to differing circumstances. The impugned order-in-appeal was upheld, and the revision application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>