https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235799 The judge dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the confiscation of alleged excess stock of laminated fabrics and woven sacks. The judge found no evidence of unaccounted excess stock, determining that the stock in question would have been properly recorded in the RG-1 register the next day. The judgment focused on the normal production patterns of the respondent, concluding that there was no wrongdoing in the stock levels of laminated fabrics and woven sacks. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:22:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235799 The judge dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the confiscation of alleged excess stock of laminated fabrics and woven sacks. The judge found no evidence of unaccounted excess stock, determining that the stock in question would have been properly recorded in the RG-1 register the next day. The judgment focused on the normal production patterns of the respondent, concluding that there was no wrongdoing in the stock levels of laminated fabrics and woven sacks. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235799