<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235795</link>
    <description>The court directed the 3rd respondent to dispose of the representation dated 22.9.2012 within eight weeks, providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others. The court clarified it did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, and the writ petition was disposed of with specific directions, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235795</link>
      <description>The court directed the 3rd respondent to dispose of the representation dated 22.9.2012 within eight weeks, providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others. The court clarified it did not express any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, and the writ petition was disposed of with specific directions, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>