<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235790</link>
    <description>Service tax valuation in works/service contracts was disputed on whether the cost of free supplies made by the service recipient had to be included in the assessable value. Because conflicting views on the issue had already been referred to a Larger Bench and orders were reserved, the appellant was held to have made out a case for interim protection. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235790</link>
      <description>Service tax valuation in works/service contracts was disputed on whether the cost of free supplies made by the service recipient had to be included in the assessable value. Because conflicting views on the issue had already been referred to a Larger Bench and orders were reserved, the appellant was held to have made out a case for interim protection. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>