<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 77 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235782</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed a notice seeking to reopen the assessment year 2006-2007 under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disputed the petitioner&#039;s claim of bad debt, alleging it did not meet statutory requirements. The court found the notice issued beyond the prescribed timeframe and determined that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 77 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235782</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed a notice seeking to reopen the assessment year 2006-2007 under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disputed the petitioner&#039;s claim of bad debt, alleging it did not meet statutory requirements. The court found the notice issued beyond the prescribed timeframe and determined that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>