<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235773</link>
    <description>The appeal against the suspension of the CHA license was successful as the appellant, who had no involvement in the mis-declaration of goods, was not responsible for the import of cigarettes in a furniture consignment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Commissioner retained the right to proceed under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004 if needed, and the order was directed to be given dasti for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235773</link>
      <description>The appeal against the suspension of the CHA license was successful as the appellant, who had no involvement in the mis-declaration of goods, was not responsible for the import of cigarettes in a furniture consignment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Commissioner retained the right to proceed under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004 if needed, and the order was directed to be given dasti for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>