https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235764 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty on additional consideration received for scrapped goods and denying service tax credit on outward transportation charges. The decision was based on the appellant's arguments regarding the nature of the goods and contractual terms for doorstep delivery, supported by factual evidence and legal precedents. The judgment highlighted the significance of evidence and precedent in determining credit eligibility, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. en-us Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:07:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235764 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty on additional consideration received for scrapped goods and denying service tax credit on outward transportation charges. The decision was based on the appellant's arguments regarding the nature of the goods and contractual terms for doorstep delivery, supported by factual evidence and legal precedents. The judgment highlighted the significance of evidence and precedent in determining credit eligibility, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235764