<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 50 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235755</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of ineligible cenvat credit, interest, and penalty was granted by the court. The judge found the appellant had complied with the deposit requirements and agreed that certain disputed cenvat credits were essential for the appellant&#039;s business activities. As a result, the court deemed the deposited amounts sufficient for the appeal&#039;s hearing and disposal, staying the recovery of the remaining amounts until the appeal&#039;s final resolution. The matter was scheduled for final disposal on a specified date to address all raised issues, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 50 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235755</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of ineligible cenvat credit, interest, and penalty was granted by the court. The judge found the appellant had complied with the deposit requirements and agreed that certain disputed cenvat credits were essential for the appellant&#039;s business activities. As a result, the court deemed the deposited amounts sufficient for the appeal&#039;s hearing and disposal, staying the recovery of the remaining amounts until the appeal&#039;s final resolution. The matter was scheduled for final disposal on a specified date to address all raised issues, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>