<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 47 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235752</link>
    <description>Recorded proceedings and the judgment were treated as conclusive of what transpired in court, so a party could not contradict the record in review by affidavit or by reference to the order sheet. If the record was said to be inaccurate, the proper course was a prompt request to correct it before the same Bench. In the absence of an affidavit from the counsel who had argued the matter, and in light of delay and subsequent conduct, no reviewable error was shown and the application was viewed as lacking bona fides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 47 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235752</link>
      <description>Recorded proceedings and the judgment were treated as conclusive of what transpired in court, so a party could not contradict the record in review by affidavit or by reference to the order sheet. If the record was said to be inaccurate, the proper course was a prompt request to correct it before the same Bench. In the absence of an affidavit from the counsel who had argued the matter, and in light of delay and subsequent conduct, no reviewable error was shown and the application was viewed as lacking bona fides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>