<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 32 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235737</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court corrected a typographical error in a judgment related to Tax Appeal No.86 of 2011. The correction changed &quot;would not apply&quot; to &quot;would apply&quot; in paragraph 18. Fresh copies of the corrected judgment were to be provided to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 32 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235737</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court corrected a typographical error in a judgment related to Tax Appeal No.86 of 2011. The correction changed &quot;would not apply&quot; to &quot;would apply&quot; in paragraph 18. Fresh copies of the corrected judgment were to be provided to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>