<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235727</link>
    <description>The Court condoned a 195-day delay in filing a revision due to satisfactory cause shown. The case involved tax liability on the supply of stone blasts, with the Tribunal erroneously presuming the assessee was not liable. The Court upheld the tax liability decision, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the assessee&#039;s claims and dismissing the revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235727</link>
      <description>The Court condoned a 195-day delay in filing a revision due to satisfactory cause shown. The case involved tax liability on the supply of stone blasts, with the Tribunal erroneously presuming the assessee was not liable. The Court upheld the tax liability decision, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the assessee&#039;s claims and dismissing the revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>