<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235724</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under the appeal procedure for Service Tax, as applied through the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, required the appellant to deposit 50% of the disputed tax and report compliance. No one appeared on the compliance date, no adjournment was sought, and compliance was not reported despite communication of the order. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated the non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction and the failure to attend the compliance hearing as sufficient to dismiss the appeal under the applicable statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235724</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under the appeal procedure for Service Tax, as applied through the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, required the appellant to deposit 50% of the disputed tax and report compliance. No one appeared on the compliance date, no adjournment was sought, and compliance was not reported despite communication of the order. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated the non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction and the failure to attend the compliance hearing as sufficient to dismiss the appeal under the applicable statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>