<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 11 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235716</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act did not apply retroactively before 1st April, 2011, and does not cover non-resident assesses with a permanent establishment in India. The Court upheld that Section 44BB applies to non-resident assesses providing services related to mineral oils. Additionally, the Court emphasized the need for a thorough examination by the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee has a permanent establishment or fixed place of profession in India, leading to a remittal of the matter for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed, stressing the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the assessee&#039;s presence in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 11 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235716</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act did not apply retroactively before 1st April, 2011, and does not cover non-resident assesses with a permanent establishment in India. The Court upheld that Section 44BB applies to non-resident assesses providing services related to mineral oils. Additionally, the Court emphasized the need for a thorough examination by the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee has a permanent establishment or fixed place of profession in India, leading to a remittal of the matter for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed, stressing the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the assessee&#039;s presence in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>