<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 5 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235710</link>
    <description>Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess on DTA clearances by a 100% EOU were assessed on the method of calculating excise duty, and the issue had already been decided by a Larger Bench in favour of the assessee. That binding precedent governed the Division Bench, so the appellant established a prima facie case for relief. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 5 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235710</link>
      <description>Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess on DTA clearances by a 100% EOU were assessed on the method of calculating excise duty, and the issue had already been decided by a Larger Bench in favour of the assessee. That binding precedent governed the Division Bench, so the appellant established a prima facie case for relief. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>