<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 863 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235705</link>
    <description>Reopening of a completed assessment is not barred where reassessment is founded on fresh adverse material and reports not examined in the earlier proceeding; mere change of opinion does not arise in that situation. A reassessment is not invalid merely because departmental or technical material was available, provided the assessing officer independently considers the record and applies his own mind rather than acting mechanically on a superior&#039;s dictate. However, where adverse material such as vigilance reports, third-party books or seized documents is used against an assessee, it must be disclosed and, where necessary, the affected parties must be confronted and given a fair opportunity of cross-examination. Failure to do so vitiates the assessment for breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 863 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235705</link>
      <description>Reopening of a completed assessment is not barred where reassessment is founded on fresh adverse material and reports not examined in the earlier proceeding; mere change of opinion does not arise in that situation. A reassessment is not invalid merely because departmental or technical material was available, provided the assessing officer independently considers the record and applies his own mind rather than acting mechanically on a superior&#039;s dictate. However, where adverse material such as vigilance reports, third-party books or seized documents is used against an assessee, it must be disclosed and, where necessary, the affected parties must be confronted and given a fair opportunity of cross-examination. Failure to do so vitiates the assessment for breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>