<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235704</link>
    <description>The HC held that reimbursable expenses received by the assessee as a clearing and forwarding agent are not includible in the taxable value under Rule 6(8) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Only the gross amount of remuneration or commission constitutes the taxable value. The court relied on precedent to clarify that reimbursements for actual expenditures incurred do not form part of remuneration or commission. Consequently, incidental business expenses reimbursed by principals cannot be taxed as part of the service value. The Revenue&#039;s contention to include such reimbursements in the taxable value was rejected, and the decision was rendered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235704</link>
      <description>The HC held that reimbursable expenses received by the assessee as a clearing and forwarding agent are not includible in the taxable value under Rule 6(8) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Only the gross amount of remuneration or commission constitutes the taxable value. The court relied on precedent to clarify that reimbursements for actual expenditures incurred do not form part of remuneration or commission. Consequently, incidental business expenses reimbursed by principals cannot be taxed as part of the service value. The Revenue&#039;s contention to include such reimbursements in the taxable value was rejected, and the decision was rendered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>