https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235702 A three-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not comply with the Tribunal's condition to deposit the directed amount for waiver of the balance pre-deposit and failed to prosecute the matter. The Tribunal recorded that there was no compliance, no representation, and no request for adjournment, so the appeal could not proceed. The underlying adjudication order, which confirmed service tax demand with interest and penalties, was noted as the subject of the appeal, but the dismissal was procedural and not a merits determination on that levy. en-us Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:27:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235702 A three-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not comply with the Tribunal's condition to deposit the directed amount for waiver of the balance pre-deposit and failed to prosecute the matter. The Tribunal recorded that there was no compliance, no representation, and no request for adjournment, so the appeal could not proceed. The underlying adjudication order, which confirmed service tax demand with interest and penalties, was noted as the subject of the appeal, but the dismissal was procedural and not a merits determination on that levy. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235702