<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 859 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235701</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the decision of the Commissioner Central Excise (Appeals) Rajkot in favor of M/s. Kandla Port Trust, ruling that the relevant date for service tax assessment is the date of providing the service, not the date of issuing invoices. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that service tax should be paid based on the rates applicable at the time of service provision. This case sets a precedent clarifying the taxable event for service tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 859 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235701</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the decision of the Commissioner Central Excise (Appeals) Rajkot in favor of M/s. Kandla Port Trust, ruling that the relevant date for service tax assessment is the date of providing the service, not the date of issuing invoices. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that service tax should be paid based on the rates applicable at the time of service provision. This case sets a precedent clarifying the taxable event for service tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>