<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 838 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235680</link>
    <description>The Central Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, confirming that exporters are entitled to rebate of duty paid on exported goods even if they avail of the customs portion of the drawback, as long as they do not claim the Central Excise portion of the drawback. The department&#039;s contention that simultaneous claim of Cenvat credit and duty drawback is impermissible was dismissed, with the judgment clarifying that such claims are allowed under relevant notifications. Allegations of suppression of facts by exporters were deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the rejection of the department&#039;s revision applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 838 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235680</link>
      <description>The Central Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, confirming that exporters are entitled to rebate of duty paid on exported goods even if they avail of the customs portion of the drawback, as long as they do not claim the Central Excise portion of the drawback. The department&#039;s contention that simultaneous claim of Cenvat credit and duty drawback is impermissible was dismissed, with the judgment clarifying that such claims are allowed under relevant notifications. Allegations of suppression of facts by exporters were deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the rejection of the department&#039;s revision applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>