<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 836 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235678</link>
    <description>Underground telephone cables used within a factory were treated as capital goods eligible for MODVAT/CENVAT credit under the excise rules then in force. The governing test under Rule 57Q was whether the goods were used in the manufacturer&#039;s factory, not whether they had a strict nexus with the finished product. The later amended definition in Rule 57AA did not control the relevant period, and credit entitlement had to be judged by the statutory provision applicable at the material time. On that basis, the cables qualified, and credit was allowed to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 836 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235678</link>
      <description>Underground telephone cables used within a factory were treated as capital goods eligible for MODVAT/CENVAT credit under the excise rules then in force. The governing test under Rule 57Q was whether the goods were used in the manufacturer&#039;s factory, not whether they had a strict nexus with the finished product. The later amended definition in Rule 57AA did not control the relevant period, and credit entitlement had to be judged by the statutory provision applicable at the material time. On that basis, the cables qualified, and credit was allowed to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>