<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 835 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235677</link>
    <description>Under the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, annual production capacity fixed on the basis of incomplete or suppressed particulars may be reopened when later material shows the original declaration was incorrect. Rule 3 requires determination from authenticated particulars and relevant material, so a capacity assessment founded on false disclosure cannot stand. The second proviso to Section 3A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 also supports redetermination where a relevant production factor was wrongly taken into account. On that basis, the Commissioner may redetermine capacity using subsequently discovered evidence of suppression or incorrect disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 835 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235677</link>
      <description>Under the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, annual production capacity fixed on the basis of incomplete or suppressed particulars may be reopened when later material shows the original declaration was incorrect. Rule 3 requires determination from authenticated particulars and relevant material, so a capacity assessment founded on false disclosure cannot stand. The second proviso to Section 3A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 also supports redetermination where a relevant production factor was wrongly taken into account. On that basis, the Commissioner may redetermine capacity using subsequently discovered evidence of suppression or incorrect disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>