https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235675 The appeals were dismissed, affirming penalties on a company and its director for non-payment of duty and submission of fake TR-6 Challans to evade duty payment. The court upheld penalties under Central Excise Rules, emphasizing the deliberate and fraudulent nature of the violations. The plea for penalty reduction was rejected, citing serious offense and legal provisions mandating duty payment. The director's involvement in goods clearance without discharging duty liabilities justified the penalties imposed. The judgment confirmed duty demand under Section 11A(2) and upheld penalties under Rule 25(1)(d) and Rule 26. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235675 The appeals were dismissed, affirming penalties on a company and its director for non-payment of duty and submission of fake TR-6 Challans to evade duty payment. The court upheld penalties under Central Excise Rules, emphasizing the deliberate and fraudulent nature of the violations. The plea for penalty reduction was rejected, citing serious offense and legal provisions mandating duty payment. The director's involvement in goods clearance without discharging duty liabilities justified the penalties imposed. The judgment confirmed duty demand under Section 11A(2) and upheld penalties under Rule 25(1)(d) and Rule 26. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235675