<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the settled nature of the issue based on previous judgments and the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeal by the High Court. The judgment provides clarity on the eligibility for Cenvat credit in cases where goods are supplied to SEZ developers without payment of duty during the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the settled nature of the issue based on previous judgments and the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeal by the High Court. The judgment provides clarity on the eligibility for Cenvat credit in cases where goods are supplied to SEZ developers without payment of duty during the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>