<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235665</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) for A.Y. 2002-03. The ITAT referred to a previous case involving a co-owner where penalty was deleted due to the assessee disclosing correct income before detection by the department, finding no fraud or neglect in the present case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235665</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) for A.Y. 2002-03. The ITAT referred to a previous case involving a co-owner where penalty was deleted due to the assessee disclosing correct income before detection by the department, finding no fraud or neglect in the present case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>