<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 808 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235650</link>
    <description>Recorded satisfaction in the assessment order is a prerequisite for imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c); absent a categorical finding that the assessee concealed particulars or furnished inaccurate particulars, mere direction to initiate penalty proceedings is insufficient. The statutory deeming fiction in section 271(1B) cannot validate earlier orders because it applies only from a later retrospective date and is inapplicable to assessment orders passed before that date. Applying these principles, penalties for the assessment years in question could not be sustained and the appeals were allowed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 808 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235650</link>
      <description>Recorded satisfaction in the assessment order is a prerequisite for imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c); absent a categorical finding that the assessee concealed particulars or furnished inaccurate particulars, mere direction to initiate penalty proceedings is insufficient. The statutory deeming fiction in section 271(1B) cannot validate earlier orders because it applies only from a later retrospective date and is inapplicable to assessment orders passed before that date. Applying these principles, penalties for the assessment years in question could not be sustained and the appeals were allowed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>