<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 801 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination, instructing a review of all evidence, including the intention behind holding shares, transaction frequency, and holding period. The AO was directed to adhere to parameters set by the High Court in prior cases. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the AO to provide the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard before finalizing proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 801 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination, instructing a review of all evidence, including the intention behind holding shares, transaction frequency, and holding period. The AO was directed to adhere to parameters set by the High Court in prior cases. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the AO to provide the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard before finalizing proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>