<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 794 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235636</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a Telecommunication Service provider, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit based on invoices in the name of their Head Office without Input Service Distribution registration. The judge found the services covered by the invoices were eligible for Cenvat Credit and had been used in Rajasthan, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. The decision was influenced by a Tribunal judgment in a similar case, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 794 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235636</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a Telecommunication Service provider, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit based on invoices in the name of their Head Office without Input Service Distribution registration. The judge found the services covered by the invoices were eligible for Cenvat Credit and had been used in Rajasthan, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. The decision was influenced by a Tribunal judgment in a similar case, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>