<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 782 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability of service tax on royalty charges paid by a company for services received from a foreign entity. The Tribunal ruled that as the demand was for a period before the enactment of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, the recipient was not liable for service tax during that time. Therefore, the appeal was rejected based on the timing of liability for service tax, without delving into the classification of the service, emphasizing the application of the reverse charge mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 782 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability of service tax on royalty charges paid by a company for services received from a foreign entity. The Tribunal ruled that as the demand was for a period before the enactment of section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, the recipient was not liable for service tax during that time. Therefore, the appeal was rejected based on the timing of liability for service tax, without delving into the classification of the service, emphasizing the application of the reverse charge mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>