<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 748 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235590</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid on horticulture and garden maintenance services. The Tribunal established that horticulture services are eligible for Cenvat credit, following precedents like Millipore India Ltd. vs. CCE, Bangalore. It was clarified that the recipient of services can claim credit even if the service was tax-exempt, and the service provider&#039;s assessment cannot be revisited by the recipient. The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 748 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235590</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid on horticulture and garden maintenance services. The Tribunal established that horticulture services are eligible for Cenvat credit, following precedents like Millipore India Ltd. vs. CCE, Bangalore. It was clarified that the recipient of services can claim credit even if the service was tax-exempt, and the service provider&#039;s assessment cannot be revisited by the recipient. The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>