https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235564 The Court upheld the adjudication orders confiscating smuggled gold from a couple returning to India from London. Despite the petitioners' contentions and requests for re-testing, expert opinions confirmed the purity of the seized gold articles. The Court emphasized its limited role in re-examining factual findings and dismissed the writ petitions, citing the careful consideration of all relevant facts in the impugned orders. The discrepancies in the goldsmith's affidavit and the presence of expert opinions distinguished this case from a previous tribunal judgment, leading to the dismissal of the petitions without costs. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:01:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235564 The Court upheld the adjudication orders confiscating smuggled gold from a couple returning to India from London. Despite the petitioners' contentions and requests for re-testing, expert opinions confirmed the purity of the seized gold articles. The Court emphasized its limited role in re-examining factual findings and dismissed the writ petitions, citing the careful consideration of all relevant facts in the impugned orders. The discrepancies in the goldsmith's affidavit and the presence of expert opinions distinguished this case from a previous tribunal judgment, leading to the dismissal of the petitions without costs. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235564