<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 720 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235562</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition by quashing the notices dated 21.05.2013 and ordering the refund of amounts recovered by enforcing the notices. The respondents were directed to refrain from initiating recovery proceedings until the statutory appeal period expires and the stay application is disposed of. The petitioner was also instructed to provide fresh bank guarantees and allowed to file an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 20.05.2013. The court found the respondents&#039; actions to be against principles of natural justice and a circular, thereby upholding the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal and seek a stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 720 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235562</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petition by quashing the notices dated 21.05.2013 and ordering the refund of amounts recovered by enforcing the notices. The respondents were directed to refrain from initiating recovery proceedings until the statutory appeal period expires and the stay application is disposed of. The petitioner was also instructed to provide fresh bank guarantees and allowed to file an appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 20.05.2013. The court found the respondents&#039; actions to be against principles of natural justice and a circular, thereby upholding the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal and seek a stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>