https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235551 The appeals were dismissed due to the repeated absence of the appellant during hearings, lack of evidence of export of goods, failure to prove detected shortage, and adjudication of demand in the appellant's absence. The Tribunal noted the appellant's consistent non-appearance despite multiple opportunities, leading to the decision to dismiss the appeals. The appellant failed to provide primary evidence to support their claims, resulting in the lack of basis for overturning the lower authority's decision. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:39:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235551 The appeals were dismissed due to the repeated absence of the appellant during hearings, lack of evidence of export of goods, failure to prove detected shortage, and adjudication of demand in the appellant's absence. The Tribunal noted the appellant's consistent non-appearance despite multiple opportunities, leading to the decision to dismiss the appeals. The appellant failed to provide primary evidence to support their claims, resulting in the lack of basis for overturning the lower authority's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235551